Industry
Update - March 7, 2005
It has been nearly a month since our last Industry Update,
and much has happened since that time. Let’s
get caught up.
OREGON:
The 2005 Salem Manufactured Home Show concluded yesterday,
and attendance was up nearly 20% from 2004! Great
weather and 17 beautiful new homes, mostly upscale triple-wides,
were featured. A two-story home was also on display
and it was impossible to tell this home was built in a factory.
People managing the event said “they just kept coming”
and reported ticket sales were brisk all weekend, even on
Sunday afternoon with just a few hours to go before closing.
Retailers and manufacturers were all smiles yesterday afternoon
as the show wound down, and the public response to the latest
in factory-built housing was virtually 100% positive and
encouraging (read my final paragraph below for more editorial
observations).
In the legislature, The Oregon Manufactured Housing Association
continues to make progress towards the passage of Senate
Bill 328, allowing HUD-code manufacturers in Oregon to build
modular homes for shipment outside the state. This
is in response to several key industry members repeated
requests to build modular homes. While it’s
far from over and you can’t call the battle won yet,
OMHA has made a great deal of progress moving this bill
forward. Also, as the date looms closer to the move
from DMV to the Building Codes Division of the Department
of Consumer and Business Services, tension mounts. On
May 1, 2005 we make the move, but several pieces of legislation
needed to be introduced in this session to try and force
DCBS to honor some of the commitments made during initial
negotiations two years ago. You can contact OMHA at
503-364-2470.
Manufactured Housing Communities of Oregon has enjoyed a
productive and successful legislative session so far.
Absent this year are any substantial threats of rent control
initiatives and other adversarial forms of legislation.
They’ve been replaced by numerous groups request for
mandatory education of community managers. MHCO and
the Manufactured Housing Coalition have worked together
to successfully introduce a bill (SB 636) that includes:
1) Minimal mandatory education for on-site managers or owners
who manage their own communities, 2) Landlords gaining the
ability to unilaterally change the rental agreement to allow
the landlord to either master meter or sub meter for water
and sewer, 3) Changes in the current law to allow RV’s
to be placed in some predominately manufactured home communities,
especially older parks with smaller spaces. You can
contact MHCO at 503-391-4496.
WASHINGTON:
Manufactured Housing Communities of Washington House Bill
1640 is still alive, even though it’s been dramatically
trimmed down, and all the heavy handed enforcement issues
are gone (for now). Some changes may include the “registration”
of manufactured home communities, including an annual fee,
of course. Even though the fee may be split between
the residents and community owners, it’s not good,
but it may be the compromise we need in order to fend off
further threats of stricter enforcement laws. ”Unfair
practices” linked to the Consumer Protection Act are
still being batted around, much to the dismay of the industry
insiders. But when the dust settles, fees and more
fees seem to be the overall theme. You can contact
MHCW at 360-753-8730.
At The Washington Manufactured Housing Association the big
news is that no one introduced legislation that could threaten
their zoning bill, which passed in the last session.
This was a session where WMHA and their members were better
served to take a wait and see approach, ready to jump at
a moments notice if anyone introduced adversarial legislation.
So far that hasn’t been the case. In Washington
as in Oregon there are a lot of problems with older mobile
homes. What to do with them, how to move them, even
where to dispose of them. Pre HUD homes are being
dumped or abandoned, especially in Eastern Washington, and
legislation or revised regulations dealing with this problem
will eventually be discussed, but not this year. This
is becoming a bigger problem in Oregon and Idaho too and
we must address it eventually. You can contact WMHA
at 360-357-5650.
IN OTHER NEWS:
Community (park) owners, brokers and operators are slowly
witnessing an unexpected phenomenon in our industry.
All of the sudden investors are quietly knocking on their
doors, inquiring about purchasing communities AT RETAIL
PRICES just to obtain the land for eventual re-development
to a “higher and better use”. This is
something we did not anticipate. While it’s
much too soon to determine whether or not this will become
a widespread business practice, we didn’t think that
the appetite for developable land in an urban or suburban
location would become this valuable. When I was selling
manufactured homes, buyers from time to time would ask “what
if I buy this home in this park and they want to kick us
out later to build a shopping mall here?” My
response was always the same. “This land is
zoned residential and it’s almost impossible to get
land re-zoned. In my opinion this will always be a
residential neighborhood”. What I didn’t
expect, nor ever anticipated in my wildest dreams, was land
speculators or developers willing to pay the same price
as a buyer purchasing the community as an ongoing, revenue
producing business, just to get the dirt. And we wonder
why GMAC exited our industry.
If this continues it would spell disaster for some of our
residents not to mention send the wrong message to chattel
lenders. It’s already tough enough to finance
a home in a land-lease community. If lenders feel
every “park” is fair game for the D.R. Horton’s
or Centex’s bulldozer we’ve got a problem.
Not to mention the bad press---this is a public relations
nightmare. Today, in Bend, Oregon, four manufactured
home communities are being closed or are slated to be closed
for re-development to site-built housing. Manufactured
home owners were on the TV news in Bend just last week,
wondering what they’re going to do with this home
they can’t afford to move. In February a similar
story ran on Portland TV about a community in Salem. In
October it was a newer community in Eugene closing. What’s
next? What are we going to do about it?
FINALLY,
As several of us from Commonwealth toured the fantastic
new homes at the Salem Home Show last Wednesday unanimously
made one glaring observation. For the most part, builders
of manufactured homes are building homes for real property
(private land) placement, not for land-lease communities.
Huge, triple-wide luxury homes designed for an attached
garage best describes the typical show home. Theses
homes were beautiful, and it made me proud to be part of
an industry that builds this caliber of home. For
the second year in a row a stunning two story home was also
on display, and once again you couldn’t tell it was
built in a factory. A few two-section traditional
manufactured homes were on display, and they were innovative
and affordable. But by in large, the industry is building
what the public is buying and the mortgage companies want
to finance….manufactured homes for suburban or rural
placement. In the land-lease community business, we’d
better accelerate the promotion of what we have to offer
and start working more closely with these fine manufacturers
and lenders or we may wake up one day and find ourselves
on the phone to ABC Development Company in New York saying:
“Hi, my name is Greg, and I’ve got a manufactured
home community on 12 acres in Beaverton, Oregon near the
MAX light rail line and Nike World Headquarters, with city
services and within walking distance of shopping and schools.
I’d be willing to sell it for $500,000/acre
and the local planning and zoning people will happily participate
in the redevelopment process. Would your company be
a potential buyer?”
Legislation to build modular homes…..new homes designed
for real property placement…..chattel lenders continue
to exit the industry. Anybody see a trend here?
We must collectively work hard to rejuvenate the land-lease
manufactured home community business in the Pacific Northwest.
One person or one company can’t do it alone.
It takes the combined efforts of our State associations
and a diverse group of experienced industry leaders to tackle
this issue. Once the Legislators have gone home for
the year I propose a tri-state commission (Oregon, Washington,
Idaho) whose sole purpose it is to identify and address
the key issues related to the continuing struggle of land-lease
manufactured home communities, recommend specific solutions,
and design a critical path to follow that will result in
fixing the problems and redesigning our business model.
Do you agree?
In the meantime, thank you for reading this Industry Update,
and have a terrific week.
Greg
Harmon - President
Commonwealth Real Estate Services
E-mail: greg@cwres.com
Telephone 503.244.2300 Ext. 101